Lucas Lyu

Don't Just Read Papers: Simulating Distributed Systems with Maelstrom

As I dive into my Distributed Systems (COMP90024) coursework this semester, one thing became clear immediately: Concurrency is hard, but Partial Failure is harder.

Reading papers on Paxos or Raft is one thing; implementing them and watching them fail because a network packet dropped is another.

That's why I'm highlighting Maelstrom, an open-source workbench that has become my "lab partner" for this subject.

The Signal 📡

  • Project: Maelstrom
  • Author: Kyle Kingsbury (aka Aphyr), the creator of Jepsen.
  • Language: The workbench is Clojure, but you can write your node logic in any language (Go, Python, Java, Rust).

The Problem ⚠️

In a distributed systems course, we often write code that works perfectly on localhost. But in the real world (and in our exams), nodes crash, messages get delayed, and networks partition.

Testing this is a nightmare. You usually need to:

  1. Spin up 5 AWS EC2 instances.
  2. SSH into them.
  3. Manually kill processes to simulate failure.
  4. Grep through logs to find why they disagreed on a value.

It's slow, expensive, and frustrating.

The Solution: Deterministic Simulation 🛠️

Maelstrom creates a "Matrix-like" simulation for your code. It launches your binary as multiple nodes on your local machine and intercepts STDIN / STDOUT to simulate the network.

This means Maelstrom can act as a "Chaos Monkey":

  • It can introduce latency between Node A and Node B.
  • It can drop 10% of messages.
  • It can partition the network so Node A cannot see Node C.

My Hands-on Experience

I tried the Gossip Glomers challenge (a series of Maelstrom challenges) using Go.

Here is a snippet of how a simple "Echo" server looks. Maelstrom sends JSON via STDIN, and we just reply:

// A simple node that just replies to whatever it receives
func main() {
    n := maelstrom.NewNode()

    n.Handle("echo", func(msg maelstrom.Message) error {
        // Unmarshal payload
        var body map[string]any
        if err := json.Unmarshal(msg.Body, &body); err != nil {
            return err
        }

        // Reply with type "echo_ok"
        body["type"] = "echo_ok"
        return n.Reply(msg, body)
    })

    if err := n.Run(); err != nil {
        log.Fatal(err)
    }
}

Running it is where the magic happens:

./maelstrom test -w echo --bin ~/go/bin/echo --node-count 1 --time-limit 10

It outputs a beautiful analysis graph showing latency and availability.

The Verdict ⚖️

If you are studying Distributed Systems: Download this.

It bridges the gap between theoretical consistency models (Linearizability, Sequential Consistency) and actual code. It forces you to handle the "Sad Path" (timeouts, retries) first, rather than as an afterthought.

Next Steps

I plan to use Maelstrom to prototype the consensus algorithm for my semester project. I'll document my journey implementing a simplified Raft log here.


Credit: Huge thanks to Jepsen.io for making distributed systems verification accessible to mere mortals.